God's existence proven by maths

[gadjo_dilo]

I've just read an article related to a problem that was much debated on this forum:
http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/com...cle3540989.ece

And I remember that I used to write that science who answered to reason demands and religion who answered to soul demands are two forces that can't be reconciled.

[Mark]

The entire article said nothing

[maxu05]

Bollocks, I say. Never the twain shall meet. Science and religion should be seperate IMO.

[Mark]

I don't know science and religion are fundamentally about the same thing. i.e. Why we are all here and how we came to be here. It's just they have a fundamentally different approach. But lots of scientists are religious, just because they can say that the universe was probably created in a specific way it doesn't mean that god needs to be excluded from that equation.

[Breeze]

— So long as the Universe had a beginning, we can suppose it had a creator, he says. But if the Universe is really completely self-contained, having no boundary or edge, it would have neither beginning nor end: it would simply be. What place, then, for a creator?

Sounds to me as if he hasn't proven anything.

[leopard]

or else proven by natuurkunde, cloud formations also indicate this.

[anthonyvop]

But did he prove the existence of Math?

[schmenke]

I thought Homer Simpson mathematically disproved the existance of God?

[thompp]

We know that God doesnt exist. If he did exist, he would care for us and love us and therefore not have invented celery.

[Drew]

So he doesn't actually prove god exists, but more that everything else doesn't really exist?

Quite frankly I prefer this formula :

http://www.liewcf.com/blog/wp-images/woman-trouble.jpg