Page 3 of 4 FirstFirst 1234 LastLast
Results 21 to 30 of 40

Thread: Boxer breathing

  1. #21
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jun 2004
    Posts
    666
    Like
    0
    Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
    Lower centre of gravity is one reason why they keep the boxer engine.
    I just spent half an hour searching for different engine spec, my goal was to compare a same cc and same compression ratio boxer v's straight 4 engine, but in the end, they had the same spec, same power and torque at same rpm and of course, this is something that you can tune, so it's not a very good comparsion.

    I really don't have a good reason as to why would a boxer outperform a standard 4 cyl, maybe because it's better balanced, is there any real proof to this? except for guessing because Atkinson drove faster and Hirvonen...

  2. #22
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jun 2003
    Posts
    1,027
    Like
    0
    Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by leno
    So what are advantages and disadvatages of boxer engine?Why subaru dont change? what is so special?
    The obious ones:
    Longer intakes, 2+2 with180dgr and distance from ex valve to turbo

  3. #23
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Feb 2001
    Location
    On the Welsh Riviera
    Posts
    38,844
    Like
    2
    Liked 3 Times in 3 Posts
    Some advantages

    http://www.irvinesubaru.com/enthu/theboxerengine.html

    Also remember that the engine is shorter than a I-4 engine and also it is fairly symetrical so the car should be better balanced. The crankshaft is also shorter too which means it can be lighter.

    Disadvantage?

    Have you ever seen how wide a Subaru engine is in the car and how little room there is either side of it? This means (as someone has pointed out) that you end up with a fairly short stroke engine which has it's disadvantages
    Rule 1 of the forum, always accuse anyone who disagrees with you of bias.I would say that though.

  4. #24
    Senior Member Mirek's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2007
    Location
    Prague / Eastern Bohemia
    Posts
    22,505
    Like
    7,834
    Liked 11,152 Times in 4,427 Posts
    Another big dissadvantage is that the engine is longitudinal and must be infront of front axle where it makes too much polar moment of innertia.
    Stupid is as stupid does. Forrest Gump

  5. #25
    Senior Member OldF's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2007
    Location
    Finland
    Posts
    1,992
    Like
    295
    Liked 313 Times in 137 Posts
    One possible reason is the intake manifold. Because Subaru has a boxer engine it has to have two intake manifolds with two cylinders per manifold compared to a normal four-cylinder engines manifold. In a four-cylinder row engines manifold where the air intake is at the either side of the manifold, the cylinder nearest the intake (from turbo) get 3-5% less air compared to the average and the outmost cylinder get 5-7% more air compared to average. If there is only two cylinders per manifold the air will possible be distributed more even between the cylinders. This would also be true at lower altitudes but maybe it’s still some difference at high altitudes where the density of the air is lower.

    Wisdom from the book: Four-Stroke Performance by A. Graham Bell
    http://www.amazon.com/Four-Stroke-Pe...480864-4783849
    “Don’t eat the yellow snow” Frank Zappa

  6. #26
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Location
    Slovenia
    Posts
    300
    Like
    0
    Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
    Why noone use wa nkle engine? is it prohibited?
    Waiting subbie to come back and maybe win:D

  7. #27
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jan 2004
    Location
    Molde, Norway
    Posts
    499
    Like
    0
    Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by leno
    Why noone use wa nkle engine? is it prohibited?
    Because Mazda isn’t in WRC…

    I think there is a factor to calculate the volume of a ****el engine somewhere in the regulation.
    (As a turbo engine of 2 litre is calculated as 3,4 (2,0 * 1,7= 3,4)

  8. #28
    Senior Member Mirek's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2007
    Location
    Prague / Eastern Bohemia
    Posts
    22,505
    Like
    7,834
    Liked 11,152 Times in 4,427 Posts
    I think that Wan.kel (why is it forbidden?) engine of that power and torque would be highly unreliable. The sealing faces of the triangle cylinder would be too stressed. The same about the central gear.
    Stupid is as stupid does. Forrest Gump

  9. #29
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Location
    Slovenia
    Posts
    300
    Like
    0
    Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by Glee
    Because Mazda isn’t in WRC…

    I think there is a factor to calculate the volume of a ****el engine somewhere in the regulation.
    (As a turbo engine of 2 litre is calculated as 3,4 (2,0 * 1,7= 3,4)
    so 1,2 litre wa.kle woudl be not competitive with others
    Waiting subbie to come back and maybe win:D

  10. #30
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Feb 2001
    Location
    On the Welsh Riviera
    Posts
    38,844
    Like
    2
    Liked 3 Times in 3 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by leno
    so 1,2 litre wa.kle woudl be not competitive with others
    Well you wouldn't be able to have a turbocharged wan kel 1.2. A normal 4 stroke engine had a power stroke per cylinder once every 2 times the crank turns. But a rotary has a power stroke each time. So to calculate the volume of a wan kel in FIA terms a 1.2 turbo rotary engine would be 1.2*2*1.7 so 4.08l.
    Rule 1 of the forum, always accuse anyone who disagrees with you of bias.I would say that though.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •