Search:

That would by default imply that Ferrari was cheating when they let Shumi by Rubens in Austria 2002. Do you wish to persuit this path?

Now you're just being anti-Ferrari :D

That wouldn't be surprising given their stance behind Austria 2002, but all we have here is Brawn, a former technical director saying he doean't know (is/was not aware). Had it been Todt though, he...

YOU started this thread and you can't even stand up for your own believes, chicken :laugh:

:rolleyes: 2002 was by far Rubens' best season in Formula 1 to date and beyond, but Ferrari's rotten reliabillity... hmpf, let me rephrase that; Rubens' rotten reliabillity is what put Shumi so far...

You didn't provide any "proof" either, because even if Brawn 'was not aware of' doesn't prove it wasn't so. Ioan, why are you so eager to prove that Shumi was not #1, a futile mission I'd say,...

But Rubens wasn't "out of the running" in Austria 2002 (6th race out of 17). And I say it again; no, I most certainly can not differentiate between #1 status and securing WDC for a specific driver,...

You're damn right I'm not. What's #1 status for if not to secure WDC? Are you for real :confused:

What! You can't possibly be serious, that's an outrageous statement even comming from you. About what Rubens have said or not, you didn't believe Fontana when he said he was ordered by Todt to hold...

Only two times :s How many times is the norm, how many times have ANY other team done this in the past ten years?

And I bet you have no proof that it wasn't!

And we idiots of course dreamt about Austria 2002 :rolleyes: