Search:

For clarity, it’s the pitot tube heater that may fail. The pitot tube itself is a static instrument with nothing more than a pressure transducer that measures the difference between the static and...

Where does it say that the files were deleted the morning of the flight?

I’m no pilot but I wouldn’t be a bit surprised to know that they would simulate emergency landings at various airstrips in...

That story is rather vague and unsubstantiated :s

There's more than one? :cornfused:

Area 51

That is a very good point Baggy.

But that would mean that the plane would need to be intact, having landed on a paved runway almost two miles long, parked undetected on a tarmac with refueling provisions.

These planes cannot...

Sorry, I tried to answer your question with a question.

No, I don’t think it’s odd that there hasn't been even the tiniest of pieces of the plane or its contents found. It’s not inconceivable to...

If you really think it landed in Pakistan, then isn't it more than a little odd that there hasn't been even the tiniest of indications an announcement made from some terrorist organization. If I...

Flying that close would have enabled the leading plane’s proximity warning system.

The aircraft in that video is a Boeing 737, about half the length and weight of a 777.

O.k., perhaps it laned behind a grassy knoll :p:

Landing a large airplane like the Boeing 777, with 300 passengers, without anyone noticing, even in a remote location, is highly improbable.

No, it's at the bottom of the sea.

A large commercial jet cannot simply land anywhere, especially on a dusty Taliban controlled airstrip in the middle of nowhere.

It, along with 300+...

It has not landed anywhere. A large plane like the Boeing 777 requires a long paved runway and I’m sure satellite images of potential landing spots have already been reviewed. A large plane like...