Search:

Must.

Not.

Comment.

http://www.autosport.com/news/report.php/id/130271/rally-gb-alters-itinerary-after-team-pressure

The car would still need homologation, same issue it has this year.

Well yeah, they basically do - they're the ones paying for it anyway. Not exclusively, but they put more in than they get back.

Sounds like JK will still be involved, so i guess a straight swap between co-driver and gravel crew?

Seb Marshall?

I don't

@sollitt - you make a very fair point, as did the gentleman making the argument about Group N cars - I accept your points and if the drivers complained then it's fair enough to consider.

The other...

To me it's not even that, so much as defining an event's safety purely in terms of speed. There are straight sections that are perfectly safe and slow spots that are dangerous. The incident in Monte...

Even by the impressively high standards set by the FIA, this is some Grade A nonsense: http://www.motorsport.com/wrc/news/fia-to-clampdown-on-excessive-wrc-stage-speeds-874175/

Fair comment.

Did you ask a question? When I caught his previous Q&As he answered everything I asked. Top interaction, don't knock it.

They've already got Lappi under contract too, give the kid a chance!

/\ This


Unfortunately, that's what happens when modern rulesets rely on the manufacturer paying a fee to allow their car to be eligible for a specific series. In circuit racing, IMSA and the WEC...

If VW can get the car to run without the potential negative publicity of being seen spending money on that whilst making cutbacks, you'd better bet they'll take it.