Search:

I'd prefer the fastest method. The only people who have been changing are the stage end reporters, but otherwise it's the same gang for a very long time.

New blood wasn't about Desborough, it was about King. Time to start retiring the oldies.

Maybe to get fresh blood instead of using the same old?

The 26 minutes comes from linear TV formats. For a 30 minute slot, you can have 22-28 minutes of programme.

I wouldn't be surprised, if they'll be trying to sell the channel to operators around the world. Then the thing would make sense.

Have they done some improvements based on the user suggestions? Ok, there was the non-commentary audio track, which isn't available any more I guess. Tho I can't understand why as it isn't exactly...

Most likely it's just repackaging the same stuff, nothing else.

After a break of not really following the rallies on WRC+, I've been watching the last few nearly from start to finish. And I'd like to complain. Ok, Molly doing the service park bits was a nice...

It's an improvement and about time they matched it with the website but still with issues. Split times info is as tiny as it can get and the stage time counter on a bright orange (or sth) colour is...

He's the only one worth keeping for stage commentary, imo.

It feels like they sometimes get lost in their own little world and literally tell you what everyone is seeing. As a viewer you'd want more than you can see and know yourself.

Stage end reporting is the most difficult, in my opinion. If you've got someone feeding you information what has happened, then you've got a chance to come up with a sensible question. But sometimes...

Every other language option seemed to be better than English. Even the Spanish seemed to talk less...

I thought you only watch WRC without commentary

That was already in Monza like that.

Live sports are all about "feeding material". E.g. repeating this weekend's broadcast exactly the same way a week later does not hold the same value as the live broadcast It's also the big reason why...

Antti, essentially AllLive is a TV channel In the current form it's fine only, when following on the computer or tablet, but when on TV you prefer to have a continuous flow and not some "screensaver"...

Personally don't like how they've been doing it this year. I do understand that social distancing and everything set boundaries but why show the rotating map between stages? Recaps, previews,...

Does the amount of people who actually read the terms and conditions exceed 1%?

Why compare something with past, when the sights should be only towards future? Yes, they have been constantly improving but they also are far away from anything that could be a perfect product.

Think they stopped broadcasting the WRC All Live audio stream as radio.

Antti, the time-related expenses aren't that small either. As the audiovisual staff typically is paid by the amount of shifts they do. So if they are on location e.g. 4 days, then cutting one day off...

As the non racing period gets longer and longer, I'm starting to wonder how the WRC+ service will compensate the long term subscribers as their main product All Live is not live at all.

From the WRC+ "newsletter". Wonder how they'll compensate

Whenever WRC.com gets updated, it's never for the better.

And in a way you don't even the the image to be from any of the zero cars. It can be from a car that passes through the stage like an hour earlier. Wouldn't look as interesting as zero car tho.