Also a problem with tarmac rallies vs gravel rallies, is that you need good drivers to have spectacular passes on tarmac. On gravel, even slow(er) drivers are often spectacular.
Printable View
Also a problem with tarmac rallies vs gravel rallies, is that you need good drivers to have spectacular passes on tarmac. On gravel, even slow(er) drivers are often spectacular.
Tarmac is for more experienced taste. It's clear you need to look with "different eyes" between gravel and tarmac. I like to expect the unexpected on tarmac events, the compression on bad tarmac, compressions on high speed narrow tarmac, overninght rain and dirty cuts, etc. If you find a good place on tarmac (=runki), it's more satisfying than on gravel. But I agree that slow and on rails like tarmac is boring, but so is gravel or snow. When cars are driven to their max, it doesn't matter what's the surface.
Tänak onboard of Novella stage https://youtu.be/NK-v7QppalU
thisone is better
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9GkyIs2fJB0