If it were really a kids radio controlled car from Argos it would have sponsors on it like.Quote:
Originally Posted by henners88
Ay Sir, Moobaaaaahdollar, Interl, Abbey National and so on and it would be a prancing duck or something :p
Printable View
If it were really a kids radio controlled car from Argos it would have sponsors on it like.Quote:
Originally Posted by henners88
Ay Sir, Moobaaaaahdollar, Interl, Abbey National and so on and it would be a prancing duck or something :p
I imagine that driver has to sit on the engine, or has that moved to the front?Quote:
Originally Posted by kfzmeister
Osmosis? :DQuote:
Originally Posted by Robinho
Quote:
Originally Posted by henners88
You forgot this bit
Now Mark Webber, an actual F1 driver and campaigner for safety sees the point. :dozey: I wonder if anyone else will care to admit that enclosing the rear wheels of the cars is not such a bad thing to do now.....Quote:
IndyCar can learn a heavy lesson from Sunday's crash. What organisers certainly have to do is work out how to stop cars leaving the ground and flying into the air in such situations.
It is a sad irony that Dan was the test driver for a new car that officials plan to introduce next year.
It has enclosed rear wheels, which will definitely help because front wheels won't be able to go over rear wheels any more, which is one of the major factors that makes cars take off.
I know, I´m not the most intelligent people in the world. Can you convince me that you arè?
How many of you are there?????Quote:
Originally Posted by Mia 01
I'm just glad that he/she wasn't agreeing with me......Quote:
Originally Posted by henners88
I know. Feels a bit weird being a Kimi Raikkonen fan on this forum lately... :erm:Quote:
Originally Posted by Daniel
The point I was making was that he was talking about cars flying and made mention of his car flying so there was possibly an implication there even if he didn't explicitly state it. I guess it takes a certain sort of driver who can look at an accident like Webber's and then at Dan's accident and not draw parallel's between the two, to drive in F1 and be fearless. He did say that his accident could have gone one of two ways. Thankfully in F1 the fences are usually at more of an acute angle to the impacts, the impacts are slower and dare I say it, the racing isn't thankfully as close! (I feel rather conflicted when saying that last part) But a flying car vs catch fence fatal accident could still happen.Quote:
Originally Posted by henners88
I think it'll be a Monty Python reference. Nobody expects the Spanish Inquisition and all......Quote:
Originally Posted by henners88