:p : But only 291.4% of people believe that.Quote:
Originally Posted by SGWilko
Printable View
:p : But only 291.4% of people believe that.Quote:
Originally Posted by SGWilko
For once the majority are right :D 70 plays 68.
71 plays 68 :)
I voted a few weeks back finally and said no he should not retire. If he is still enjoying it and he has a team that wants him, he should stay in it.
I was glad to see him do well in Canada and it's a shame he didn't get on the podium. And though some people will say this proves he still has it, he is beating Rosberg, etc, consider this.
With his excellent race in Canada he is 1 point ahead of Kobayashi.
That might say more about Kobayashi than Schumi.Quote:
Originally Posted by airshifter
Looks like Mercedes want him to stay, and there is even a chance that there will be a contract extension:
autosport.com - F1 News: Haug hails Schumacher's performance
Fousto's nightmares continue! :D
I do find Mercedes' attitude towards Schumacher curious. The desperation to defend him goes beyond anything I can recall. One good performance and suddenly he is Mercedes' man for years to come, apparently, as though no other drivers of calibre will materialise during that time. And, as much as I have always had much time for Norbert Haug, his comment that Schumacher's race in Canada was him 'at his best' is quite laughable. He drove very well, certainly, but by the standards of his comeback, not his best during his years of dominance.Quote:
Originally Posted by ioan
Quote:
Originally Posted by ioan
:laugh:
12th to 2nd withing a dozen of laps in wet conditions, then defending in the dry against DRS enhanced competitors with better cars on a track with 2 DRS zones one of them very very long in a dog of a car it's great performance and Haug knows it well.Quote:
Originally Posted by BDunnell
I think what ben is saying is that the Schuey of old would have won.Quote:
Originally Posted by ioan