He lost over 15 seconds on that last lap and seemingly slowed down right at the very last corner to a snails pace. Does anyone else find that worthy of some kind of inquest. It smells extremely fishy.
Printable View
He lost over 15 seconds on that last lap and seemingly slowed down right at the very last corner to a snails pace. Does anyone else find that worthy of some kind of inquest. It smells extremely fishy.
Yes, that was obviously the only explanation, nothing to do with dry tyres on a wet track.
Damn, it was exciting though.
check Trullis last lap time (also a 1m44sec) - the toyotas were the only ones to stay on drys, and it gained Glock a couple of places, but was just too wet.
Gentlemen, start your excuses!
UFO's. What about the UFO's!!Quote:
Originally Posted by Mifune
Dammit I was going to blame them as well!Quote:
Originally Posted by Knock-on
I personally don't think the track was that wet but who really knows?
Wait 'till the stewards dock Lewis with 25s for not securing his steering wheel after the race!
Well, fish live in water and the simple reason was dry tyres on a wet track don't stick :p :Quote:
Originally Posted by bowers
There was no evidence of it raining harder on that last lap. The Toyota of Glock was pulling faster/equal times than Lewis up until that final lap. How can you deny that there is a possibility of something like that happening? There are millions perhaps billions of dollars at stake, I think it's foolish to think that something like that can not happen until we see some evidence of it not happening. It's a possibility and I expect someone will say something in the press soon, probably Alonso. Obviously you'd need to see the on-board or telemetry of Glock to get a good idea.