Here's the link: http://www.pitpass.com/fes_php/pitpa...s_art_id=31317
................but what the heck is a chicken? :confused:
Friday practice will be intresting. :D
Printable View
Here's the link: http://www.pitpass.com/fes_php/pitpa...s_art_id=31317
................but what the heck is a chicken? :confused:
Friday practice will be intresting. :D
AHAHAH, he has the best surname ever.
Perhaps this will help............http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/ChickenQuote:
Originally Posted by Valve Bounce
OK, I was blindsided, as intended. However, is the chicken got anything to do with the Yoda wings? :DQuote:
Originally Posted by CarlMetro
I agree :DQuote:
Originally Posted by theugsquirrel
Will be interesting to see if Super Aguri can keep up their pace, especially against the Honda's.
I think they should keep quiet about the chicken. Surely it counts as a moveable aerodynamic device and is therefore illegal?Quote:
Originally Posted by Valve Bounce
given that chickens are flightless, then there wings cannot be adjudged to primarily have an aerodynamic effect, and as a result any aero benefit is purely secondary to the chicken wings primary purpose, whatever that may be!
so, in my eyes, chickens are a completley legal innovation and not an aero device at all :)
Quote:
Originally Posted by Robinho
Sorry, but regarding your association with non flight of chickens as to the legality of these chicken or yoda wings, I have to point out that F1 cars are not supposed to fly either. I think these wings are supposed to have an opposite effect of keeping the cars on the ground.