Page 7 of 7 FirstFirst ... 567
Results 121 to 131 of 131
  1. #121
      Mr Alca-Tazizzle's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2006
    Location
    San Diego, Ca
    Posts
    7,982

    Default

    This is quite vague, but it is the latest I can find on Ferrari engine issue.
    It states clearly enough that Ferrari feels it was their responsibility to understand the system. It's not the the type of oversight I would expect from them in this millennia!
    http://formula-1.updatesport.com/new...-ECU/view.html

    "It is similarly being reported that Ferrari thinks the fuel pressure problem that stranded Kimi Raikkonen down the Melbourne grid last Saturday is also related to the McLaren ECU.

    "This kind of thing can happen when you are working with one procedure that you do not know so well. Now we know that there is a conflict we can make sure it does not happen again," a team spokesman told GP Week.
    Those who believe in telekinetics raise my hand.

  2. #122
      Knock-on's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2002
    Posts
    15,131

    Default

    Well, back to the thread title.

    Ferrari suffered engine problems probably brought on by the excessive heat and nothing to do with the ECU.

  3. #123
      janneppi's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2002
    Posts
    5,302

    Default

    Keep your personal comments to yourselves and discuss the matter in and, which sure as hell is'n Michelin.
    C'est la vie ja taksi tuo.

  4. #124
      Bagwan's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2001
    Posts
    6,194

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Knock-on View Post
    Well, back to the thread title.

    Ferrari suffered engine problems probably brought on by the excessive heat and nothing to do with the ECU.
    There was a quote in the last day or 2 where Ron(I think) , defended Domenicalli and Ferrari , and said something about there being millimetres between the top teams .
    I know , a little sketchy , but it was something like that .

    Anyway , could that be a reference to McLaren mounting it in some way the others haven't tried -i.e.-spacing it up 2 or 3 mm from the mounting surface ?
    "No pen , no pen ." -what Sato said to me .

  5. #125
      nigelred5's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2002
    Location
    On Chesapeake Bay.
    Posts
    4,286

    Default

    hmmmmmmm, let me see, I'm sure there are very likely still wheel speed sensors, numerous brake sensors, an electronically operated transmission, ..... thinking out loud.......a pit speed limiter button....... I'm sure there is at least one accelerometer in the car somewhere......... still just thinking out loud...... most early tc utilized brakes, not engine retardation......... pushing multiple buttons....... driver "inadvertently" hitting pit speed limiter coming off of corner...... rumours of ghosts........ hmmmmmmmm.
    HINCHTOWN!!

  6. #126
     
    Join Date
    Sep 2004
    Posts
    2,736

    Default

    Ferrari certainly have their hands full. Multiple engine failures in P1 alone. Ouch. They better get to learning the ins and outs of the ECU fast, if that's really the problem.
    J

  7. #127
      Knock-on's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2002
    Posts
    15,131

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by jjanicke View Post
    Ferrari certainly have their hands full. Multiple engine failures in P1 alone. Ouch. They better get to learning the ins and outs of the ECU fast, if that's really the problem.
    Ferrari have already said that the failures they have had are not to do with the ECU

Page 7 of 7 FirstFirst ... 567

Visitors found this page by searching for:

n/a

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •