Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 20 of 23
  1. #1
     
    Join Date
    Feb 2005
    Posts
    618

    Default Ferrari's wind-tunnel failure

    somewhere around two weeks ago, Ferrari had a monumental failure in its wind tunnel.

    one of the links in the chains that drive the rolling road snapped when the road was running at more than 200km/h.

    it was out of action for more than a week while awaiting analysis and repair, but they don't really know what caused it.

    with three shifts of aero nerds running there seven days a week, that's effectively three weeks out of action.

    I don't imagine there will be any immediate impact, though if Ferrari goes off the boil just a touch in two or three months, then plays catch-up, I won't be surprised.

    Interestingly, Ferrari still run only a half-scale wind tunnel. Williams, Toyota, BMW, McLaren, Honda etc all have full-scale tunnels (some can run two full-sized cars line-astern, but hardly ever bother) alongside their half-scale models and rely on mathematicians to calibrate the differences.
    the wise man does at once what the fool does finally - macchiavelli

  2. #2
      Easy Drifter's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Location
    Georgian Bay, On.
    Posts
    3,518

    Default

    Not as accurate but it was a heck of a lot more fun to study oil droppings and bug guts streaks on the car. Ah ain't science wonderful. Just showing my age.

  3. #3
      ioan's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2003
    Posts
    25,233

    Default

    They'll have to do a better selection of the aero parts to be tested if they want to keep moving as soon as the device will be up and running again.
    Just shows how much more important aero development is than anything else.
    Big cheers to Max for freezing engine development!
    Michael Schumacher The Best Ever F1 Driver
    Everything I post is my own opinion and I\'ll always try to back it up!
    They need us: www.ursusarctos.ro

  4. #4
      andreag's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2006
    Location
    Barcelona
    Posts
    526

    Default

    They can also buy Honda their wind tunnel. Maybe Ferrari can make it worth.

  5. #5
     
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Location
    Leeds, United Kingdom
    Posts
    406

    Default

    The pace of development in F1 is such that this failure could hamper at some point. I remember Williams moving mountains to get a full-scale wind tunnel many years ago, realising how crucial it would be.

  6. #6
      Gannex's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2002
    Location
    Denver, Colorado
    Posts
    2,856

    Default

    Are any of them full-scale?

  7. #7
      Hawkmoon's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2003
    Location
    Wollongong, Australia
    Posts
    2,678

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by tamburello View Post
    Ferrari have three wind-tunnels.
    That simple statement perfectly sums up what's wrong with F1 today. Three bloody wind tunnels! And they probably run the stupid things 24 hours a day too.
    Forza Ferrari!!

  8. #8
      Valve Bounce's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2001
    Posts
    18,891

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by tamburello View Post
    Ferrari have three wind-tunnels.
    "LINK PLEASE"
    When in doubt, run in circles, scream and shout

  9. #9
      ioan's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2003
    Posts
    25,233

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Hawkmoon View Post
    That simple statement perfectly sums up what's wrong with F1 today. Three bloody wind tunnels! And they probably run the stupid things 24 hours a day too.
    Completely agree with this statement. But at least they froze the engine development and also limited the engines to 19000 rpm (after they were running close to 21000 last season), not to mention that when they went from V10s to v8s they increased the minimum weight!

    All this means that the field is leveled on the engine side already and McLaren has finally got their first bulletproof engine since 1999!

    Ferrari runs away with the trophies for a few years, they change the rules.
    Renault runs away with it twice, they change the rules again.
    I expect them to change the rules after ever back to back wins for a driver from now on.
    How nice is the FIA these days!
    Michael Schumacher The Best Ever F1 Driver
    Everything I post is my own opinion and I\'ll always try to back it up!
    They need us: www.ursusarctos.ro

  10. #10
     
    Join Date
    Feb 2005
    Posts
    618

    Default

    No, Ferrari has no full-scale wind tunnel.

    the half scale, which is the one which broke, is the largest they have.
    the wise man does at once what the fool does finally - macchiavelli

  11. #11
      Valve Bounce's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2001
    Posts
    18,891

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Mickey T View Post
    No, Ferrari has no full-scale wind tunnel.

    the half scale, which is the one which broke, is the largest they have.
    The way I see it, then Ferrari are just plain lucky to have people who go in the right direction on instinct. If the other tunnels are less than half size, then the correlation of results must be extremely difficult.

    By the way, Mickey, I just would like to thank you for coming here with insights that the rest of us have no way of knowing. Don't be a stranger, OK?
    When in doubt, run in circles, scream and shout

  12. #12
      aryan's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2004
    Location
    Melbourne, Australia
    Posts
    2,058

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Valve Bounce View Post
    By the way, Mickey, I just would like to thank you for coming here with insights that the rest of us have no way of knowing. Don't be a stranger, OK?
    Well...there is only so much he can say out loud in a public forum.

  13. #13
     
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Posts
    1,228

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Mickey T View Post
    No, Ferrari has no full-scale wind tunnel.

    the half scale, which is the one which broke, is the largest they have.
    are you sure? i thought they had one that took models from 65% up to full size with maximum simulation speeds of 150kph for full scale up to 250kph for 65%.

    may be wrong though but i thought i knew who developed it.
    Justice is blind but doesn't have to be stupid.

  14. #14
     
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Posts
    1,228

    Default

    done a bit of digging online and came up with this. its not 100% accurate but not too far out. at least it gets the right designer although i think a german company built it (or was that the other one. it could be)

    http://www.grandprix.com/ns/ns01420.html
    Justice is blind but doesn't have to be stupid.

  15. #15
      Valve Bounce's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2001
    Posts
    18,891

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Flat.tyres View Post
    done a bit of digging online and came up with this. its not 100% accurate but not too far out. at least it gets the right designer although i think a german company built it (or was that the other one. it could be)

    http://www.grandprix.com/ns/ns01420.html

    I hope you realise this was a 9 year old article.
    When in doubt, run in circles, scream and shout

  16. #16
      ioan's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2003
    Posts
    25,233

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Valve Bounce View Post
    I hope you realise this was a 9 year old article.
    So what?
    Some things doesn't change in 9 years.
    Michael Schumacher The Best Ever F1 Driver
    Everything I post is my own opinion and I\'ll always try to back it up!
    They need us: www.ursusarctos.ro

  17. #17
      Ranger's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2006
    Posts
    4,929

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by ioan View Post
    Some things doesn't change in 9 years.
    Maybe so, but that seems pretty unlikely in the realms of F1 technology.

  18. #18
      Valve Bounce's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2001
    Posts
    18,891

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by ioan View Post
    So what?
    Some things doesn't change in 9 years.

    I don't believe that the R&D of Ferrari "doesn't change in 9 years". Even you don't believe that.
    When in doubt, run in circles, scream and shout

  19. #19
     
    Join Date
    Feb 2005
    Posts
    618

    Default

    It's the same tunnel, with a lot of upgrades and mods over the years.

    the one that was kept quiet, though, was the Honda failure in the full-size tunnel last year.

    apparently, the tethers snapped, and the speed of the rolling road spat the full-size F1 car into the fan blades. Very expensive...

    i was in their tunnel a few weeks ago and i couldn't believe the size of the tethers. then somebody with very close access to the aero team there told me this.
    the wise man does at once what the fool does finally - macchiavelli

  20. #20
      ArrowsFA1's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2001
    Location
    Sunny south coast
    Posts
    16,383

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Mickey T View Post
    the one that was kept quiet, though, was the Honda failure in the full-size tunnel last year.

    apparently, the tethers snapped, and the speed of the rolling road spat the full-size F1 car into the fan blades. Very expensive...

    i was in their tunnel a few weeks ago and i couldn't believe the size of the tethers. then somebody with very close access to the aero team there told me this.
    Didn't Nick Fry deny that this happened recently
    Riccardo Patrese - 256GPs 1977-1993

Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast

Visitors found this page by searching for:

ferrari wind tunbel scale

michael schumacher tunnel failure

Ferrari formula 1 wind tunnel scale

valve failure ferrari

ferrari wind tunnel 24 hours

honda wind tunnel tether

wind tunnel failure

ferrari wind tunnel failure

ferrari wind tunnel dimensions of the rolling road

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •