Page 3 of 4 FirstFirst 1234 LastLast
Results 41 to 60 of 62
Like Tree9Likes

Thread: RRC vs S2000 NA

  1. #41
    RS
    RS is offline
     
    Join Date
    Oct 2000
    Posts
    4,238

    Default

    Watching the video links posted on the Mille Miglia thread it seems the fast way to drive the RRCs is very clean. S2000 are much more spectacular to watch. I hope R4T doesn't end up sounding and looking like RRC on the stages

  2. #42
      dimviii's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2007
    Posts
    5,575

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by stepunk View Post
    Basso and Andreucci are on Pirelli, Hanninen and Scandola use Michelin.
    Pirelli weather because Pirellis do their best on damp, wet and cold roads (they're maybe even better than Michelins in this type of conditions, IMO)
    i mean that they are not using the wet or intermediate type,they are using the rx type which is for dry asphalt.
    that pirelli is better on these conditions is not something to be absolute,same in dry roads too imho

  3. #43
      Mirek's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2007
    Location
    Prague / Eastern Bohemia
    Posts
    11,122

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by dimviii View Post
    i mean that they are not using the wet or intermediate type,they are using the rx type which is for dry asphalt.
    that pirelli is better on these conditions is not something to be absolute,same in dry roads too imho
    In the past Pirelli were always better in these conditions on Italian asphalt. Even if it was just dump and they run on soft slicks. They always started to loose with growing temperature of asphalt.
    Meum est propositum in taberna mori.

  4. #44
      dimviii's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2007
    Posts
    5,575

    Default

    know that Mirek,just i d like to say that at Greek asphalt(at least) there are types of asphalts that Pirellis are better,and some types that Michelins are better.Really cant say that this tyre, is definetely better than the other.And i am not talking about damp-wet conditions,but at complete dry and high temperatures we have in Greece.

  5. #45
    RS
    RS is offline
     
    Join Date
    Oct 2000
    Posts
    4,238

    Default

    So after Basso's near domination of Mille Miglia can we draw any conclusions to the question in this thread?

    Now I'm curious to see which car he will chose for Corsica. I prefer to watch (and hear) S2000 cars but it would be kind of interesting to see Basso in Fiesta RRC vs. Sordo in Mini RRC.

  6. #46
      Mirek's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2007
    Location
    Prague / Eastern Bohemia
    Posts
    11,122

    Default

    According to Czech magazine "Rally" the latest evolution of Fiesta RRC has new cylinder head and engine mapping resulting in a growth of power which is now around 275 Hp. They wrote the car also had new gear ratios. They wrote it was first used by Al Rahji in Portugal.

    I didn't know about that.
    Meum est propositum in taberna mori.

  7. #47
      OldF's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2007
    Location
    Espoo, Finland
    Posts
    1,526

    Default

    But now we all do . Was there anything about the torque?

    I also remember that Gerard Quinn tweeted that the Fiesta RRC has 260 ps when it was introduced. If it know has 275 ps, it would be an improvement of 5,8% which could be realistic. MINI got a 3% increase in the power by redesigning the induction system etc. (prodrive)

    I had a recollection that I had read about that somewhere and after a deep search in memory I recalled it was in gpweek, issue 119 (9th of May 2011) GP Week : Issue 115, Page 1

    The changes (homologations) by that time was only for reinforcement of the cylinder head but Loriaux said that theyve done a lot of simulations concerning the shape of combustion chambers etc.

    Probably its the result of those simulations and tests M-Sport (Ford) have homologated in the beginning of this year (Homologations).


    The next ones are off topic but I couldnt resist the temptation to put them here.

    I see it little confusing when Citroen says the DS3 have 350 Nm torque (with 98 SP commercial fuel) with a 29 mm restrictor (http://boutique.citroenracing.com/cm...be96b59bc3.pdf)
    and M-Sport says the Fiesta RRC (Ford Fiesta RRC) has only 360 Nm with a 30 mm restrictor. OK, these are the official figures but still.

    IMO another inconsistency on M-Sports site is when they say that the RRC has it peak torque @ 4750 rpm and the WRC car has it peak torque @ 4000 rpm with a bigger restrictor.

  8. #48
      OldF's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2007
    Location
    Espoo, Finland
    Posts
    1,526

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Sulland View Post
    Ok, have not seen that, do you have a link?
    If you mean the Mini, the link is http://www.motoringfile.com/wp-conte...es-package.pdf

  9. #49
      Sulland's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2004
    Location
    Kristiansand, Norway
    Posts
    3,352

    Default

    Impressed by how evenly matched the RRCs and the S2000 cars are in Korsika. Not a bad job by those who calculated the restrictor size for the RRCs !

  10. #50
    RS
    RS is offline
     
    Join Date
    Oct 2000
    Posts
    4,238

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Sulland View Post
    Impressed by how evenly matched the RRCs and the S2000 cars are in Korsika. Not a bad job by those who calculated the restrictor size for the RRCs !
    I kind of agree but I still think we need to see more. Basso on the coming events will be the perfect benchmark.
    dimviii likes this.

  11. #51
     
    Join Date
    Jun 2004
    Posts
    3,582

    Default

    Can't wait for San Remo roads.
    SlowSon likes this.
    PLEASE HELP ABOUT MC 2014 DRIVE:
    https://fundrazr.com/campaigns/7SeW4

  12. #52
    JAM
    JAM is offline
      JAM's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2005
    Location
    Porto - Portugal
    Posts
    1,931

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by RS View Post
    I kind of agree but I still think we need to see more. Basso on the coming events will be the perfect benchmark.
    We need to see a gravel rally.

    On tarmac we saw almost everything, and i said "almost" because we need a event with fast stages.
    Three gears are enough!

  13. #53
    RS
    RS is offline
     
    Join Date
    Oct 2000
    Posts
    4,238

    Default

    I guess Basso will do San Marino which should help, although I don't think he's as good on gravel as on asphalt.

    Shouldn't the 1.6Ts be at an advantage on gravel due to better traction?

  14. #54
      mousti's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2007
    Posts
    2,064

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by JAM View Post
    We need to see a gravel rally.

    On tarmac we saw almost everything, and i said "almost" because we need a event with fast stages.
    A rally like Ypres should have helped very different tarmac stages then Corse or San Remo. Barum and such would be also good.

  15. #55
    RS
    RS is offline
     
    Join Date
    Oct 2000
    Posts
    4,238

    Default

    Looking at Eurosport simulcam, the Mini only seemed to have an advantage over the Skoda under braking. The Skoda was faster round and out of the corners. But this could be anything, tyre compound, driver, setup... But it's interesting because I thought it would be on twistier sections that the Mini should have the advantage.

    IRC CORSICA SS5 SIMULCAM SORDO vs KOPECKY - Video Gallery - IRC Intercontinental Rally Challenge - Eurosport

  16. #56
      Gard's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2003
    Posts
    1,020

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by RS View Post
    Looking at Eurosport simulcam, the Mini only seemed to have an advantage over the Skoda under braking. The Skoda was faster round and out of the corners. But this could be anything, tyre compound, driver, setup... But it's interesting because I thought it would be on twistier sections that the Mini should have the advantage.

    IRC CORSICA SS5 SIMULCAM SORDO vs KOPECKY - Video Gallery - IRC Intercontinental Rally Challenge - Eurosport
    Sordo is probably used to a bit more torque, so he brakes to late in the RRC. With less torque youll probably have to brake bit earlier and carry a bit more speed through the corners.
    SlowSon likes this.

  17. #57
     
    Join Date
    Feb 2011
    Posts
    233

    Default

    Just a question, not an assertion, but will braking LATER give you more speed through or out of a turn?
    Otherwise, I agree that Sordo will / should not spend much time trying to adjust to a "not so new car."

  18. #58
     
    Join Date
    Jan 2012
    Posts
    956

    Default

    I think he means that if you break earlier, then you begin accelerating earlier (before the apex) too, using the "middle throttle". If you have bigger torque you dont care about that (exit of the corner with big momentum) and brake late 'til the apex. Later braking doesnt mean longer.

  19. #59
    JAM
    JAM is offline
      JAM's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2005
    Location
    Porto - Portugal
    Posts
    1,931

    Default

    Interesting that in a fast corner (the left corner at the beggining) Sordo lost a lot to the Skoda. It was nothing to do with lack of power, and by the way he brakes, it won't seem a problem of handling.

    The way the Mini brakes is powerfull. Driver or car? The mini brakes strong and late, but won't seem to lose to Skoda on the last left corner.
    Three gears are enough!

  20. #60
      Mirek's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2007
    Location
    Prague / Eastern Bohemia
    Posts
    11,122

    Default

    On a rally like Corsica I can imagine they can drive very different way to achieve similar times. It's a lot about the efficiency of using brakes and tyres not in one or two corners we can see but in thousand of corners in several stages. It's difficult to judge anything but sure it's very different from them.
    dimviii likes this.
    Meum est propositum in taberna mori.

Page 3 of 4 FirstFirst 1234 LastLast

Visitors found this page by searching for:

rrc vs s2000

s2000 vs rrc

rrc s2000skoda rrcs2000 skoda rrcdifference s2000 rrcfiesta rrc vs s2000www.rrc.acr.ins2000 rrcclio rrcs2000 a rrcerc s 2000Super 2000 vs rrc power available rpmclio rs 2013 1.6 T power graphRRC CLEAR TYPEna s2000ford fiesta rrc pricecitroen ds3 rrcrrc a s2000ford fiesta rrc vs s2000s2000 vsrrc or s2000torque vs engine speed graph ford fiesta 1.5rrc carsclio r3 gearsrrc cars2000 and rrc faster forumrrc vs super 2000s2000 1.6t power curve

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •